We’ve written before about why Financial Freedom Day is a misleading phrase. Last week, we took that conversation to our network!
As part of our ongoing EO Community Catalyst series – run in partnership with I-COM, who bring the lived perspective of an employee-owned business – we brought together leaders from across the employee ownership community to work through the practical questions that don’t get enough airtime. What does preparation for Financial Freedom Day actually look like? What should businesses be doing now, not just in the final stretch? And what does the milestone genuinely mean for the people inside the business?
We asked the room to rename ‘FF Day’. The names that came back told us a great deal about where people are in the journey: Debt Free Day, Financial Milestone Day, Independence Day, Real EO, Just Another Day. Several groups concluded, rightly, that the name matters less than the conversation you build around it. One group suggested letting employees choose it themselves. That instinct (to make it participatory, to make it mean something specific to the people it affects) is the kind of thinking that separates well-prepared businesses from the ones who arrive at the milestone and find it underwhelming.
But the name wasn’t what the room kept coming back to…
The moment succession took over
We hadn’t planned for succession to dominate as a theme, but it did anyway.
In the panel discussion, when we opened the floor on succession planning, something shifted. This wasn’t an abstract strategic topic for the leaders in the room. It was live, felt urgent and was highly relatable.
One panellist described their succession plan unravelling within two months of completing the EO transaction, and what followed was improvised rather than planned – including some uncomfortable conversations about who held what authority, and a prolonged period of uncertainty that the business navigated through performance and goodwill rather than structure.
Another attendee (an external hire brought in to stabilise a business mid-transition) described inheriting an organisation that had a plan, but no Plan B. Inflation, market pressure and shareholder tensions had arrived simultaneously. The plan hadn’t accounted for any of it.
A third shared something more raw: a key manager had fallen gravely ill, and there were no documented procedures and no shared access. Operational disruption at the exact moment the business needed to be focused elsewhere. Not unique to EO, but a reminder that succession risk doesn’t begin and end with the leadership tier.
What struck us wasn’t the individual stories. It was the consensus in the room. The nods of agreement and the sense that these weren’t obscure cases people were listening to sympathetically, but that they were situations people were experiencing themselves.
Why this period increases succession risk
The EO transition window (from transaction to FF Day and beyond) is the period when succession planning matters most and is most often deferred.
The reasons are understandable. There is momentum to protect and there are relationships to manage – not least with founding shareholders who may still hold reserved matters or board-level influence. There are governance structures being built and tested for the first time, and leadership teams are managing the transaction and the business simultaneously. Succession can feel like a ‘tomorrow problem’.
But it isn’t.
Research cited in our panel session found that virtually every business that has been through succession said the same thing: they didn’t start early enough.
Many of our community report having had a ‘false start’ when it comes to succession planning. The businesses that get this right treat succession not as an event, but as a standing item. It may sit on the risk register. It gets reviewed at every board cycle. The question isn’t just who comes next but reviews where the risk is concentrated right now, and what happens if that person isn’t here tomorrow?
What good preparation looks like
Across the breakout discussions and the panel, the same capabilities kept surfacing as the difference between businesses that arrive at FF Day in good shape and those that don’t.
Financial literacy that reaches beyond the board and governance structures that are working and trusted before they’re tested under pressure. A clear, communicated link between employee contribution and reward, so that when profit share does arrive, it means something. And succession planning that begins early enough to be deliberate, rather than reactive.
None of this is unique to employee ownership. But the EO structure raises the stakes.
The question worth asking now
If FF Day is on your horizon (three years away, eighteen months, or closer) the most useful question isn’t what to call it. It’s whether the business has built the foundations that will make it mean something when it arrives.
At Still We Grow, we work with leadership teams, boards and trustees in exactly this window.
Our Growth Foundations framework gives businesses an honest, evidence-based picture of where they stand across the capabilities that determine how well they perform through transition – including succession readiness, governance clarity and leadership capability.
If what we’ve described resonates, we’d welcome a conversation.
Start a conversation